So happy to hear! Interestingly, this is the one I feel I was less prepared for. I had to cut quite some things in order to publish it. There will be follow-ups! Thanks so much for commenting. Even short comment like this one has tremendous value for me. Thanks!
Thanks Nicole! I want to build better examples to show that particular concept. I only know that I have stumbled on that problem a few times in the past, so I am sure it does exist. Aggregation can bring more clarity than high granularity in some cases.
Absolutely! Originally I was planning to write much more about it but I ran out of time. Funnily, I have a comment in my notes about writing a whole post on layering!
Best of the series so far!
So happy to hear! Interestingly, this is the one I feel I was less prepared for. I had to cut quite some things in order to publish it. There will be follow-ups! Thanks so much for commenting. Even short comment like this one has tremendous value for me. Thanks!
I really enjoyed your challenge to the notion that more granular data is “better”. Excellent visual examples showing why it may or may not be.
Thanks Nicole! I want to build better examples to show that particular concept. I only know that I have stumbled on that problem a few times in the past, so I am sure it does exist. Aggregation can bring more clarity than high granularity in some cases.
Very curious about how to use layering to make it more powerful.
Absolutely! Originally I was planning to write much more about it but I ran out of time. Funnily, I have a comment in my notes about writing a whole post on layering!
A focus on layering with some other examples could be interesting!
Yes! See my comment to Sophia's comment below. It was in the plan but I ran out of time. I will work on it!!